|
Mike Oxsaw
11:41 Mon Mar 18
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
One of the things that I keep coming back to is that after it turned off all it's comms, it was effectively an unidentified intruder, so why didn't the (Thai and) Malaysian air force scramble to intercept it?
New York is/was not the only city with "Twin Towers".
|
violator
3:04 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Enjoy his videos on Facebook, and the Dutch girl pilot who is very easy on the eye
|
Coffee
2:38 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Nurse
:-)
"list of planes the pilots have flown" -- indicative of experience. The captain was fairly senior and trained other pilots, including the First Officer on that day. So he knew what he was doing. The FO was virtually brand new on the aircraft type.
Your "tolerance for content creators" -- indicative more of you being an impatient old moo than anything else. He's hardly Magnus Pike.
"he doesn't have plastic false fingernails" -- true.
"stupid accent" -- he can't help that. He's Swedish, lives in Spain, speaks in English, and works for Ryan Air. Of course he's going to have a stupid accent.
"This is why I tend to read" -- and write/pontificate.
"Did he ever conclude anything or add new info?" -- he added a couple of (what I thought were) interesting observations that, if true, could be significant in understanding what went on in that plane. For example, the difference in the tone of the captain's voice in consecutive reports of his position to ATC. The fellow posits that in one report, his voice sounded regular and unhassled. In the next report a few minutes later (which was unnecessary, because it was simply a repeat of what he'd already reported), the tone of voice was different. It sounded more preoccupied, suggesting the possibility that he'd been away from the radio and that he'd suddenly become busier without a clear and obvious need to be busier. It also suggests (although not stated in the video) that the FO had not been in his seat in the time between the first and second of those reports, because if he had been there would have been no need to repeat the report of their position. What caused the apparent surge in activity? He also urges new searches for the plane based on new calculations.
"By browsing our site you agree to our use of cookies." -- what cookies do you use? Chocolate chip? Lemon and ginger (recommended)?
|
Nurse Ratched
2:07 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Frigging hell, Coffee. Over 8 minutes in and he's still chuntering on about a list of different classes of planes the pilot and copilot had flown in the past.
I've given up, because I've a low tolerance for 'content creators' who don't get the feck on with it and wave their hands about in front of the camera. At least he doesn't have plastic false fingernails he is trying to show off, but it's still distracting. Stupid accent, too. I recommend closed captions.
This is why I tend to read instead of watch/listen.
Thanks anyway, Coffee. Did he ever conclude anything or add new info? If so, what was it?
|
Coffee
11:27 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
OTB - yep, hard to see beyond him. That's the who. The why remains.
|
On The Ball
11:21 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Cheers Coffee, I've saved that for later.
I struggle to get past the pilot though.....
|
Manuel
11:07 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
I thought it was Moyes's fault?
|
Sydney_Iron
10:59 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Captain Peacock, in the Cockpit with the Quran?
|
Coffee
10:48 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Banjo, good to see you!
Yes, it does raise those questions, though in all likelihood they have already been answered.
|
Banjo
9:03 Sun Mar 17
Re: Malaysian MH370 revisited
|
Very interesting Coffee. Raises the big questions, who and why?
|
|
|
|
